From: "Mark Lundquist" <mlundquist2@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Multidimensional array vs. array of array
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 22:45:20 GMT
Date: 2001-12-11T22:45:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40wR7.34446$ER5.389337@rwcrnsc52> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrna1d1o8.7nl.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de
"Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote in message
news:slrna1d1o8.7nl.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de...
> How does a skilled Ada programmer define a return type containing a
> multidimensional array? Of course, the simple solution works:
>
> type Equations is array (Rows range <>, Columns range <>) of Number;
> type Workspace (row : Rows; col : Columns) is record
> eqs : Equations (Rows'First .. row, Columns'First .. col);
> ... some more stuff ...
> end record;
> function Init_Workspace return Workspace;
>
> But this approach fails miserably on extracting a single row from the
result
> as well as on construction the result in a recursive function.
Would it help you to just define a distinct type to represent a row in
isolation, but keep your matrix as defined above (i.e. not in terms of
composition of the row type)?
-- mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-11 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-11 22:22 Multidimensional array vs. array of array Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-12-11 22:45 ` Mark Lundquist [this message]
2001-12-17 15:56 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-12-11 23:03 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-12 8:39 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-12-13 0:26 ` James Rogers
2001-12-13 9:02 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-12-13 21:49 ` Nick Roberts
2001-12-14 9:45 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox