Re: 7E7 Flight Controls Electronics

[Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com>]

Thanks for the backup on that. ;-) To which I'd add this: We're better 
off not building more Ada software development tools. While that's not a 
bad thing, what Ada needs is more *end*user* apps where the end user 
doesn't care that it is written in Ada. They also need to make money in 
some manner. If Ada gets more tools, that's nice but it would be better 
for Ada to get more revenue-generating apps to support itself. Use Ada 
for some real-world end-user project and it starts creating a life of 
its own.

MDC

Richard Riehle wrote:

> it is now in.   It has been suggested we rename the language. I
> think it is better to follow Marin's advice and simply build the
> best systems we can using it.   Also, we need to counter the
> idiotic claims made in ACM's Queue magazine.


-- 
======================================================================
Marin David Condic
I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm

Send Replies To: m   o   d   c @ a   m   o   g
                    c   n   i       c   .   r

     "Face it ladies, its not the dress that makes you look fat.
     Its the FAT that makes you look fat."

         --  Al Bundy

======================================================================