From: billwolf@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe,2847,)
Subject: Re: Nested separate compilations
Date: 13 Jan 89 18:58:16 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4082@hubcap.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4079@hubcap.UUCP
From article <4079@hubcap.UUCP>, by wtwolfe@hubcap.UUCP (Bill Wolfe):
>
> I have now run into two compilers which balk at nested separate
> compilations, as per the following example:
After receiving e-mail to the effect that the ACVC *did* check for this,
I did some investigation and discovered that the compilers did indeed
accept the code IF SUBMITTED MANUALLY; it was the automatic recompilation
facility which was causing the problem. I had created a directory full
of foreign code and invoked the automatic compilation-order tool in order
to get the code compiled, and been rudely informed that the nested
separate compilation units were missing (utter nonsense) and that c
compilation was therefore not initiated. When I collapsed the nested
separates into the first-level stubs, everything worked perfectly.
Thanks to everyone who sent mail! Sorry for the (incorrect) semicolons
in "separate (whatever);". This is about the only place where you
can't have a semicolon at the end, and every time I make this mistake
I wonder WHY semicolons are not allowed here, just for consistency reasons..
Bill Wolfe
wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-01-13 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-01-12 19:45 Nested separate compilations Bill Wolfe
1989-01-13 18:58 ` William Thomas Wolfe,2847, [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox