From: "Larry Barowski" <larrybarATengDOTauburnDOTeduANDthatISall>
Subject: Re: C# should be last plain-text language
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:22:45 -0600
Date: 2004-02-07T14:22:45-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40255dbe_1@news.vic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 97f98cd5.0402070314.2678974e@posting.google.com
>
> You are right, of course. But my intention is what developer
> should not work with raw code at all. The raw code should be
> something alike intermediate assembler code in some compilers.
> And then separated database dont't have much benefits.
>
It has the huge benefit of compatibility with existing tools
and systems without the need for "importing and exporting"
of raw source or cluttering of source with meta-comments.
If no one uses your tool, it will be useless in promoting the
programming methodology it supports. Those using the tool
exclusively would not have to work with raw source code.
> By the way, I looked at http://www.jgrasp.org/
> but from PDFs I see the same alphabetical list of files I argue against.
:)
> ...
Well, the focus of jGRASP is low and high level
visualizations. Viewing or editing source code without
having a frequently updated control flow graph in the
indentation space is something we argue against.
-Larry Barowski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-07 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-06 6:29 C# should be last plain-text language Amir Yantimirov
2004-02-06 10:01 ` Peter Amey
2004-02-06 11:53 ` Marius Amado Alves
2004-02-07 1:22 ` Larry Barowski
2004-02-07 1:28 ` Larry Barowski
2004-02-07 11:14 ` Amir Yantimirov
2004-02-07 20:22 ` Larry Barowski [this message]
2004-02-08 15:29 ` Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2004-02-09 6:30 ` Amir Yantimirov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox