From: "Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name)" <marco.poggioli@terrazzi.com >
Subject: Re: [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ?
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:02:32 GMT
Date: 2003-08-15T12:02:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3uipjvoght3fbdcfqkdrsn9r50f8jeo7gc@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnbjp7b1.1ru.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:44:57 +0000 (UTC), Preben Randhol
<randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote:
>>
>> One last question comes in mind: is the free GNAT stable enough?
>
>> Can I trust it like if it were gcc C++ ?
>
>Depends what you mean by this. Which version etc... Personally I would
>trust GNAT more than gcc C++. Besides the Ada language help catch much
>more bugs than the C++ compiler.
:-)
>
>Don't see why you cannot use Ada (and GNAT).
Ok. Point taken. count one more on the Ada Bandwagon.
Thanks all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-15 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 22:42 [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ? Marco Poggioli
2003-08-14 23:24 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-08-15 3:42 ` Steve
2003-08-15 8:28 ` Marco Poggioli
2003-08-15 8:44 ` Preben Randhol
2003-08-15 12:02 ` Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name) [this message]
2003-08-15 13:40 ` Steve
2003-08-15 13:42 ` Steve
2003-08-15 7:30 ` Erlo Haugen
2003-08-15 8:38 ` Preben Randhol
2003-08-15 19:40 ` Simon Wright
2003-08-16 3:18 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-08-17 11:35 ` Simon Wright
2003-08-15 8:47 ` Pascal Obry
2003-08-15 23:24 ` Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name)
2003-08-17 17:43 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox