From: Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: What is the history behind Natural'First = 0 ?
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 10:22:03 -0400
Date: 2020-05-04T10:22:03-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3u80bf5v76at9hs1lgejum0g6f5nsmvv27@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87ftcg2yip.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com
On Sun, 03 May 2020 20:02:22 -0700, Keith Thompson
<Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> declaimed the following:
>The 1980 edition had the same thing. I know there was another
>preliminary version in 1982 (before the first official standard in
>1983), but I don't know what it said.
What is your definition of "official standard"? MIL-STD-1815 and 1815A
/are/ official standards -- just not international standards.
ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A (dated 22 Jan 1983, approved 17 Feb 1983
"superseding MIL-STD-1815 10 Dec 1980") has the 0-based NATURAL and 1-based
POSITIVE.
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com http://wlfraed.microdiversity.freeddns.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-01 4:51 What is the history behind Natural'First = 0 ? reinert
2020-05-01 7:52 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-05-01 8:38 ` AdaMagica
2020-05-01 10:24 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-05-01 19:03 ` Keith Thompson
2020-05-01 21:36 ` Robert A Duff
2020-05-03 20:08 ` Keith Thompson
2020-05-04 3:02 ` Keith Thompson
2020-05-04 8:50 ` Paul Rubin
2020-05-04 14:22 ` Dennis Lee Bieber [this message]
2020-05-01 10:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-05-01 18:14 ` Optikos
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox