From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: No multiple dispatch in Ada95?
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3m4btg$ngk@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3m3c72$5ms@disunms.epfl.ch
In article <3m3c72$5ms@disunms.epfl.ch>, matomira@di.epfl.ch (Fernando
Mato Mira) writes:
|> I was also dissapointed by this. I found that the inability of
|> defining a new virtual for a set of classes without access to
|> source code is a slap in the face to reuse (of couse, such new operations
|> should live in a different package, to avoid problems when you get
|> a new release of that library).
I don't understand the problem. You can derive from a tagged type in a
child of the package in which that type is declared, inheriting the
operations of the original and adding others.
--
Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-05 0:00 No multiple dispatch in Ada95? Fernando Mato Mira
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Fernando Mato Mira
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen [this message]
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox