From: Theodore Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3m3d14$e21@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3m0nv1$pv2@nef.ens.fr
sands@clipper.ens.fr (Duncan Sands) wrote:
>Essentially the question is: why so much function calling overhead
>in GNAT?
>
>In summary: 55 seconds with function calling overhead.
> 44 seconds without function calling overhead.
>PS: The corresponding C code takes about 6 seconds. This surprises
>me too.
Did you try compiling gnat with the optimizations turned on?
T.E.D. (structured programming bigot)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 GNAT function calling overhead Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robb Nebbe
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Theodore Dennison [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox