From: cjames@stout.entertain.com (Colin James III)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3m3aia$7u9@stout.entertain.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com
In article <D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com>,
Kenneth Almquist <ka@socrates.hr.att.com> wrote:
>
>I hope that GNAT funding will cover a bunch of performance tunin ...
> Kenneth Almquist
In about April, 1994 (one year ago) at a FRAWG meeting, I believe it was
General Little, before he retired, answered my question of whether
GNAT would be funded said, "No, no more money for GNAT".
If ACT goes public, maybe you could buy stock in that "hope".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 GNAT function calling overhead Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robb Nebbe
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Duncan Sands
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Colin James III [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox