From: HUMPHREY@ASD1.JSC.NASA.GOV (HUMPHREY_TERRY)
Subject: Re: Unconstrained Objects
Date: 1995/04/06
Date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3m13mo$6b9@killerbee.jsc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ls78u$nr3@gnat.cs.nyu.edu
In <3ls78u$nr3@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> dewar@cs.nyu.edu writes:
> GNAT allocates the maximum size for unconstrained variant records. We
> consider this the preferable implementation, since hidden use of the3
> heap seems intolerable.
>
Does this mean that GNAT does not implicitly allocated from the heap
under any circumstances? If the answer is no, then under what circumstances
does GNAT implicitly allocate from the heap?
Thanks in advance,
Terry Humphrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-31 0:00 Unconstrained Objects Eric Shulman
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` HUMPHREY_TERRY [this message]
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Cyrille Comar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <3lt22a$18p@maple.enet.net>
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox