comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Dennison <dennison@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Is "Ada" 95 or 83? (was: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?)
Date: 1995/04/05
Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3lva0m$f31@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu

dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>pragma Atomic is in Ada 85, it is not found in the obsolete language defined
>by the previous standard.
>
>Seriously, we should from now on consider on this newsgroup that Ada means
>Ada 95 by default. If people want to ask questions or make comments about
>Ada 83 they should be careful to specify that this is what they are talking
>about.

I think that will be a good idea, once a validated Ada 95 compiler exists.

Gnat, R.R., and others have compilers that are damn close, perhaps even 
actually conform, but at the moment there is no Ada 95 compiler.

This should only be an issue for another month or so. You guys can wait 
that long, can't you?

T.E.D. (structured programming mafioso)





  parent reply	other threads:[~1995-04-05  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1995-03-23 23:10 Why no exception hierarchy ? Mogens Jensen
1995-03-24 11:19 ` Michel Gauthier
1995-03-24 21:52   ` Tucker Taft
1995-03-25  1:50   ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 12:40     ` David Weller
1995-03-27  5:47       ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 16:03     ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-27 19:23   ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-28 16:56     ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-29  0:00       ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-30  0:00         ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-31  0:00       ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-04  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
     [not found]         ` <1995Apr4.210804.9579@eisner.decus.org>
1995-04-05  0:00           ` Ada means what version by default ? Michael Feldman
1995-04-06  0:00             ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05  0:00           ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05  0:00         ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05  0:00           ` Robert A Duff
1995-04-05  0:00             ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05  0:00           ` Garlington KE
1995-04-06  0:00             ` Versions of Ada (was Why no exception hierarchy ?) Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Garlington KE
1995-04-06  0:00           ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-06  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Garlington KE
1995-04-07  0:00             ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-05  0:00         ` Michael Feldman
1995-04-05  0:00         ` Theodore Dennison [this message]
1995-04-07  0:00           ` Is "Ada" 95 or 83? (was: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?) Robert Dewar
1995-04-07  0:00       ` Ada means what version by default ? Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-25 18:13 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert Dewar
1995-03-28 18:15   ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-03-31  0:00   ` Mats Weber
1995-04-04  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06  0:00       ` Mats Weber
1995-04-07  0:00         ` Kenneth Almquist
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox