From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Date: 1995/04/05
Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3lurur$esb@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ichbiah.271.2F82D56D@jdi.tiac.net
Jean D. Ichbiah (ichbiah@jdi.tiac.net) wrote:
: Since when have you become an adept of the Soviet practice of
: rewriting history? There is no such thing as Ada 83: it is called
: Ada. Moreover, look at the cover of the new standard and as
: far as I can read it refers to a language called Ada 95!
Actually, mine just says "Information technology - Programming languages - Ada".
: As a Gnat vendor your zeal at burrying Ada prematurely is
: clearly understandable, but let us be a bottle of Dom Perignon
: that total lines of Ada 95 do not exceed those of Ada before 2000?
Ummm.. if I compile my Ada [not 95] code with my Tartan 9X compiler in
a couple of years, will that make it Ada 95 code?
If so, this might be an interesting bet! Will enough Ada [not 95] compilers
support Ada 95 by 2000 that most of the existing Ada code has been recompiled
under at least one of them by one user?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources Lockheed Fort Worth Co.
If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-23 23:10 Why no exception hierarchy ? Mogens Jensen
1995-03-24 11:19 ` Michel Gauthier
1995-03-24 21:52 ` Tucker Taft
1995-03-25 1:50 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 12:40 ` David Weller
1995-03-27 5:47 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 16:03 ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-27 19:23 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-28 16:56 ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-29 0:00 ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-30 0:00 ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-31 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Is "Ada" 95 or 83? (was: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?) Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Garlington KE [this message]
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Versions of Ada (was Why no exception hierarchy ?) Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Garlington KE
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert A Duff
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Garlington KE
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
[not found] ` <1995Apr4.210804.9579@eisner.decus.org>
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Ada means what version by default ? Michael Feldman
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-25 18:13 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert Dewar
1995-03-28 18:15 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-03-31 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox