From: brashear@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Philip Brashear)
Subject: Re: GNAT and subunits
Date: 28 Mar 1995 07:58:25 -0500
Date: 1995-03-28T07:58:25-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3l915h$hud@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3l79nr$nnt@felix.seas.gwu.edu
In article <3l79nr$nnt@felix.seas.gwu.edu>,
Michael Feldman <mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu> wrote:
>
...
>
>Did you just re-_link_, or go back through the GNAT binder? Given that
>GNAT is more "open" than many other compilers, you can end-run
>the binding process very easily. If you went through the binder, and
>were not asked to re-compile the parent package body, I think this is a
>serious bug. ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
...
I used the "gnatbl" command to invoke the GNAT binder. BTW, I had a
(main) PROCEDURE (not a package) with a subunit that was also a procedure.
I don't think this would make any difference.
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-28 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-27 14:46 GNAT and subunits Philip Brashear
1995-03-27 21:12 ` Michael Feldman
1995-03-28 12:58 ` Philip Brashear [this message]
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-27 22:20 ` Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1995-04-01 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1995-03-28 16:57 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox