From: pug156@aol.com (Pug 156)
Subject: Re: WTB: DOS ADA Compiler
Date: 11 Mar 1995 11:38:26 -0500
Date: 1995-03-11T11:38:26-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jsjm2$4tg@newsbf02.news.aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3jpnf4$a13@gnat.cs.nyu.edu
I believe that using GNU NYU Ada Translator (GNAT) would be good, as the
'gcc' used with the 'gnat' extension would give you both an Ada 95
compiler (early Beta version) with a Modula 2 compiler.
If you read some of the GNAT propaganda, you'll find that you might be
able to extend your product in Ada, leaving large parts of it in its
current Modula 2 form. The 'gcc' tool also supports C, C++, and (I think)
FORTRAN. These are more stable than the GNAT part, so you could start now
in some C++ and switch to Ada 95 later. I read something on the GNU run
time system. If your careful during the link phase, a program written in
all three languages should not have any problems.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-11 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-09 3:33 WTB: DOS ADA Compiler Joe Steponaitis
1995-03-10 14:24 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-11 16:38 ` Pug 156 [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox