From: verne@pc.gcs.litton.com
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-1679A(Navy)
Date: 11 Mar 1995 04:22:45 GMT
Date: 1995-03-11T04:22:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jr8il$4lq@news.rain.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3jpp3v$nr1@explorer.csc.com
> Jeff Seigle <jseigle@csci.csc.com> writes:
> In article <3jncg0$7vu@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com> l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE) writes:
> >Doc Elliott (helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil) wrote:
> >: ?!?!?!?! The Navy actually will accept a CSCI that has KNOWN problems?
> >: And yet they still get more of the DoD budget than we do.....
> >
> >To be fair, I think all U.S. military services have a waiver and deviation
> >process that permits accepting CSCIs with known problems.
>
> Every commercial software product you buy has "known problems." Trouble is,
> you're not the one who knows about them. Wouldn't you rather have a list
> of the problems? It is not unheard of to deliver software with known
> problems to the DoD or anyone else, as long as you come clean about it (and
> fix it later).
>
>>>>
Well said!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-11 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-10 14:52 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Jeff Seigle
1995-03-10 15:37 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-11 4:22 ` verne [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-03-07 3:02 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mark Cronan
1995-03-07 4:50 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
1995-03-08 12:44 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-09 17:05 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-18 1:30 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Scott . Smart CDR
[not found] ` <3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army. <50716@suned1.Nswses.Navy.MIL>
1995-03-21 18:12 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-23 12:23 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mike Meier
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox