From: Henri Altarac <haltarac@rain.org>
Subject: Re: ADA FUNCTIONS TO PROCEDURES
Date: 10 Mar 1995 22:20:41 GMT
Date: 1995-03-10T22:20:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jqjbp$im7@news.rain.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: INFO-ADA%95031010004644@VM1.NODAK.EDU
CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM wrote:
>
>
> Robert Dewar <dewar@CS.NYU.EDU> writes:
> >
> >Can you tell us, just for curiosity, why anyone would want such a tool?
> >I would be surprised if one exists, because I can't see any legitimate use
> >for it!
> >
> I'd be inclined to agree, except for one possible issue.
I have another possible reason.
In some (strange) coding standard I saw, they required that
function should not have any side effects. Procedure could.
-----
Henri Altarac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-10 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-10 15:56 ADA FUNCTIONS TO PROCEDURES CONDIC
1995-03-10 22:20 ` Henri Altarac [this message]
1995-03-11 16:26 ` Pug 156
1995-03-11 21:27 ` James A. Krzyzanowski
1995-03-11 22:24 ` David Weller
1995-03-12 3:21 ` Henri Altarac
1995-03-13 19:34 ` Bob Kitzberger
1995-03-13 17:39 ` James A. Krzyzanowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-03-08 3:24 Tuan Anh Nguyen
1995-03-09 12:05 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-09 12:06 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox