From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE)
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-1679A(Navy)
Date: 9 Mar 1995 17:05:04 GMT
Date: 1995-03-09T17:05:04+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jncg0$7vu@butch.lmsc.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army.mil
Doc Elliott (helliott@losat.redstone.army.mil) wrote:
: ?!?!?!?! The Navy actually will accept a CSCI that has KNOWN problems?
: And yet they still get more of the DoD budget than we do.....
To be fair, I think all U.S. military services have a waiver and deviation
process that permits accepting CSCIs with known problems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Garlington GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
F-22 Computer Resources Lockheed Fort Worth Co.
If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-09 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-07 3:02 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mark Cronan
1995-03-07 4:50 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
1995-03-08 12:44 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-09 17:05 ` Garlington KE [this message]
1995-03-18 1:30 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Scott . Smart CDR
[not found] ` <3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army. <50716@suned1.Nswses.Navy.MIL>
1995-03-21 18:12 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-23 12:23 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mike Meier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-03-10 14:52 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Jeff Seigle
1995-03-10 15:37 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-11 4:22 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox