From: verne@pc.gcs.litton.com
Subject: Re: DOD-STD-1679A(Navy)
Date: 7 Mar 1995 04:50:57 GMT
Date: 1995-03-07T04:50:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jgonh$lfm@news.rain.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3jgic3$q3g$1@sydney.DIALix.oz.au
> cronan@sydney.DIALix.oz.au (Mark Cronan) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project which, alas is using DOD-STD-1679A. The project
> is being done in ADA but the question is comming up, what is the
> interpretation of the phrase "machine instruction words".
>
>
> Thanks
> Mark
>
>
>>>>
I know that you don't want to hear this answer but-----
If the Ada compiler has the ability to list assembly language than that will supply your answer...
else, use the load map and make an assumption as to the average size of each assembly instruction (e.g. for a byte oriented
machine having 16 and 32 bit instruction -- 3 bytes/inst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-07 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-07 3:02 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mark Cronan
1995-03-07 4:50 ` verne [this message]
1995-03-08 12:44 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-09 17:05 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-18 1:30 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Scott . Smart CDR
[not found] ` <3jkddt$mk1@michp1.redstone.army. <50716@suned1.Nswses.Navy.MIL>
1995-03-21 18:12 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Doc Elliott
1995-03-23 12:23 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Mike Meier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-03-10 14:52 DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Jeff Seigle
1995-03-10 15:37 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) Garlington KE
1995-03-11 4:22 ` DOD-STD-1679A(Navy) verne
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox