From: kkrieser@ionet.net
Subject: Re: debugging GNAT programs
Date: 6 Mar 1995 00:38:55 GMT
Date: 1995-03-06T00:38:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3jdliv$bj7@ionews.ionet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3jcmo9$skq@gnat.cs.nyu.edu
In <3jcmo9$skq@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>"This step could eventually be skipped IMHO"
>(along
>with an extensive philosophical discussion in which others felt that generating
>the main program in C somehow declared that C was a superior language to
>Ada -- not quite sure I ever managed to follow that logic, but anyway we
>do intend to "fix" this "problem".
Of course, by that light, machine code is declared as a superior lanquage, since most
languages, unless interpreted or P-code, are converted into machine code<G>
-----------------------------------------
-- Kevin Krieser
-- Using OS/2 Warp
-- New Address: kkrieser@ionet.net,
-- or kkrieser@bix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-03-06 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-02 14:52 debugging GNAT programs Marc Graham
1995-03-02 16:52 ` Robert A Duff
1995-03-03 2:47 ` Pug 156
1995-03-04 4:26 ` Tom Griest
1995-03-05 19:20 ` Bernard Banner
1995-03-06 19:34 ` Tom Griest
1995-03-02 22:23 ` Keith Thompson
1995-03-03 22:33 ` Robert S. White
1995-03-05 15:42 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-05 15:52 ` Robert Dewar
1995-03-06 0:38 ` kkrieser [this message]
1995-03-06 15:14 ` Robert S. White
1995-03-03 4:57 ` Vladimir Vukicevic
1995-03-04 14:07 ` Cyrille Comar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox