From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: '9X or '95 ?
Date: 28 Feb 1995 09:41:51 -0500
Date: 1995-02-28T09:41:51-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ivcng$o9g@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gauthier-2702951122590001@164.81.60.62
Regarding Ada 9X, some time ago I edited the GNAT sources to remove
all references to Ada 9X, and replace with Ada 95.
I even changed the name of the pragma Ada_9X to Ada_95 (this pragma is used
to ensure that a unit is compiled in Ada 95 mode, even if it is with'ed by
a unit being compiled in Ada 83 mode).
P.S. there are a number of neat pragmas and attributes in GNAT, for a
complete list see the source files of sem_prag and sem_attr. One of these
days we will complete the full documentation!
prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-02-28 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-02-27 11:27 '9X or '95 ? Michel Gauthier
1995-02-28 14:41 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox