From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Problem with Address Clauses
Date: 11 Feb 1995 08:57:42 -0500
Date: 1995-02-11T08:57:42-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3hifon$bcl@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3hdlsr$a8a@theopolis.orl.mmc.com
Requiring static expressions in address clauses is probably an allowable
restriction given that rep clauses are somewhat impl dependent anyway,
but it is *certainly* an extremely unfriendly restriction. So you may
not be able to sue, but you could switch!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-02-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-02-09 18:11 Problem with Address Clauses Bob Gilbert
1995-02-10 15:16 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1995-02-11 13:57 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
[not found] ` <3hsvie$a2u@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>
[not found] ` <3hug0j$f50@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
[not found] ` <3hvlbd$pk6@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>
[not found] ` <3ibsta$2ub@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
[not found] ` <3idapr$ngb@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
1995-02-25 21:19 ` ANSI C allows extensions (was: Problem with Address Clauses) Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox