From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Ada explanation?
Date: 23 Jan 1995 16:36:26 GMT
Date: 1995-01-23T16:36:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3g0lua$iba@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1995Jan19.235443.25311@nosc.mil
In article <1995Jan19.235443.25311@nosc.mil>, sampson@nosc.mil
(Charles H. Sampson) writes:
|> Does this document have any credence in the industry? (I've never
|> heard of it before, obviously.) I certainly wouldn't peruse it for any
|> other information, since the author/compiler seems to think that the
|> most important piece of information is hackers' opinions.
Correction: Not hacker's opinions, but the author's unsupported
assertions about what "hackers are nearly unamimous in observing". I'd
be willing to bet a month of involuntary servitude on a C++ project that
he never conducted a survey.
--
Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-01-23 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-01-18 16:27 Ada explanation? Bob Wells #402
1995-01-19 23:54 ` Charles H. Sampson
1995-01-20 17:09 ` Roger Labbe
1995-01-23 16:36 ` Norman H. Cohen [this message]
1995-01-25 7:01 ` David O'Brien
1995-01-20 5:25 ` Robert Dewar
1995-01-22 3:21 ` David Weller
1995-01-22 14:04 ` Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760
1995-01-23 11:50 ` David Weller
1995-01-23 15:44 ` David Emery
1995-01-24 14:10 ` David Weller
1995-01-20 10:25 ` Keith Thompson
1995-01-21 22:05 ` David O'Brien
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox