From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
Subject: Re: Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:10:31 -0400
Date: 2006-07-29T15:10:31-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3eosp3-4r9.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1154108821.14640.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:08 -0400, Jeffrey Creem wrote:
>
>
>> I don't think QT really
>>solves the license problems that most people are worrying about.
>
>
> QT might solve a few pricing problems though, if there are any,
> as perhaps Trolltech doesn't sell to Boeing-budget organizations
> only.
>
Doesn't look like it really solves the problem all that much. If you
want one platform (e.g. just linux or Just windows) it costs $3300 per
developer for Qt. ($6600 per developer if you want to target three
platforms).
This is probably more expensive for a 5 seat than GtkAda (I don't have
any quotes for GtkAda so who knows...Also it may be that you can't get
GtkAda from AdaCore without also getting GNAT first).
Still, this is not the $90 tool that everyone seems to think that
everyone else is using.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-29 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-27 23:08 Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda Yves Bailly
2006-07-28 7:02 ` vgodunko
2006-07-28 7:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-28 10:09 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-28 10:24 ` michael bode
2006-07-28 10:34 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-28 13:17 ` Simon Clubley
2006-07-28 14:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-28 15:56 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-28 17:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-29 19:10 ` Jeffrey Creem [this message]
2006-07-30 14:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-28 16:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox