From: john@nospam.demon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Subject: Re: Ada Embeded System Alternatives
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:38:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2003-06-27T08:38:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3efc01e2.2360013@news.btclick.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EFB6A17.48E8A2A4@yahoo.com
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:04:42 GMT, CBFalconer <cbfalconer@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Ada 95 is supposed to be completely downward compatible to Ada
>83.
Oh no it isn't :-)
See http://archive.adaic.com/docs/compat-guide/compat-guide6-0.txt.
This tells you where your Ada83 code (other than that which uses
third-party libraries) may be incompatible with Ada95. Fortunately
there aren't many cases but being pedantic about it it isn't
completely downward compatible.
Best Regards
John McCabe
To reply by email replace 'nospam' with 'assen'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-27 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-26 20:55 Ada Embeded System Alternatives Paul Robinson
2003-06-26 21:52 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-26 22:04 ` CBFalconer
2003-06-27 8:38 ` John McCabe [this message]
2003-06-26 23:58 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox