Re: Task execution time (writing a scheduler)

Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
> 
> | -----Message d'origine-----
> | De: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net [mailto:Kilgallen@SpamCop.net]
> ...
> | 
> | To communicate better, you should explain what you mean by EDF.
> OK, but within this context, EDF is widely used.
> 
> I have checked AI-307, and this is exactly what i was looking for, thank you
> Martin.
> 
> It's tagged:
> !priority High
> !difficulty Hard
> I hoppe compiler vendors will endorse the proposal in spite of the
> difficulty.
> 
> 

Last minute information about this and other proposals (from Alan Burns):

"There was a WG9 and an ARG meeting last week as part
of Ada Europe. I thought it might be interesting
to you all to get an update on the progress
of real-time AIs

Ravenscar AIs (249 and 305) - have already passed through WG9

Partition Elaboration Policy (265) now agreed by WG9

Execution Timers (budget timing) (307) agreed by ARG,
under editorial review - will pass to WG9

Non-Preemptive Dispatching (298) agreed by ARG,
under editorial review - will pass to WG9

Rewording of D.2 (321) agreed by ARG,
under editorial review - will pass to WG9

Timing Event (297) agreed by ARG,
under editorial review - will pass to WG9

Task Termination Procedure (266) still alive but best
way to meet varying demand still not certain.

Dynamic Ceiling (327), well received, work to be done
but looks likely to succeed.

All in all very good progress is being made - let get
more together at the forthcoming workshop in September.

Alan
-- Professor Alan Burns, Head of Department Department of Computer 
Science University of York Heslington York, UK YO10 5DD"