comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: Task execution time
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:10:28 +0100
Date: 2003-06-24T14:10:28+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ef84d4f$1@baen1673807.greenlnk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EF841BD.7000906@noplace.com

"Marin David Condic" <nobody@noplace.com> wrote in message
news:3EF841BD.7000906@noplace.com...
> I took a peek at this briefly and I think it would be a nice feature to
> have. But it could be a tough thing to do in a variety of platforms
> where it would count most. (Incredibly useful in realtime embedded
> systems with no OS and where you have to keep track of CPU utilization
> to stay on budget.) Important to this would be an accurate method of
> determining total CPU utilization versus wall time. I don't know if
> AI-307 covers that since I just looked at the summary & didn't want to
> pull the full text from the CVS tree.

Yes, that's my take on it too. I think something useful could be added
to, say VxWorks (taskHookLib) by a user implementation. But to
acheive really good accuracy, I suspect will take the compiler vendor
and OS provider to provide.

For Win32, access the Task Manager Performance could be a useful
implementation and again, for real accuracy, I suspect it's  up to the
compiler vendor and OS provider...





      reply	other threads:[~2003-06-24 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-23 13:44 Task execution time Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-23 14:00 ` Task execution time (writing a scheduler) Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-23 14:51 ` Task execution time Martin Dowie
2003-06-23 15:15   ` Martin Dowie
2003-06-24 12:19   ` Marin David Condic
2003-06-24 13:10     ` Martin Dowie [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox