From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Avionic Proximity Warning
Date: 4 Jan 1995 14:48:03 GMT
Date: 1995-01-04T14:48:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3eecf3$179s@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: INFO-ADA%95010309592615@VM1.NODAK.EDU
In article <INFO-ADA%95010309592615@VM1.NODAK.EDU>, CONDIC@PSAVAX.PWFL.COM
writes:
|> Basically, it worked by having two planes trade off
|> positional information and if they agreed that they were in
|> immanent danger of collision (something under a mile, if memory
|> serves) they'd take a vote on which direction each plane should
|> move in.
A two-voter vote? That sounds fishy, given the high probability of a
tie.
--
Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-01-04 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-01-03 15:59 Avionic Proximity Warning CONDIC
1995-01-03 19:14 ` Joe Rodnite
1995-01-04 14:48 ` Norman H. Cohen [this message]
1995-01-04 18:48 ` Robert Dewar
1995-01-04 23:55 ` Dave Funk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-01-05 15:33 CONDIC
1994-12-31 15:44 Bob Wells #402
1995-01-03 19:48 ` IanMaclure
1994-12-31 13:51 Bob Wells #402
1995-01-03 23:33 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox