comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 10:14:04 +0200
Date: 2003-05-05T10:14:04+02:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3eb61d59$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccof2lqoad.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com

Robert A Duff wrote:
> tmoran@acm.org writes:
> 
> 
>>Why not
>> declare
>>     package Instance is new Generic_Package (Integer);
>>     subtype Ptr is Instance.Node_Content_Ptr;
>>     P : Ptr;
> 
> 
> That works only if you want to declare the pointer type at the same
> place where the instantiation is.  In many cases, you don't.  For this
> reason, it's almost always better to pass the pointer type into
> generics.

   In my case, "Ptr" is already defined before the instantiation of the 
package and I should not change its definition.

   But again, I did not think of that possibility, so thanks for the 
suggestion.

Rodrigo




  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types 
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01  8:58   ` 
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-01  9:06   ` 
2003-05-01  9:58     ` Martin Krischik
2003-05-01 13:00       ` 
2003-05-02  9:14         ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-05-02 10:43           ` 
2003-05-02 10:50             ` 
2003-05-01 10:09     ` 
2003-05-02  1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02  9:52   ` 
2003-05-02 16:18     ` tmoran
2003-05-02 16:57       ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39         ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05  8:14         `  [this message]
2003-05-05 16:40         ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34           ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox