Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 12:50:17 +0200
Date: 2003-05-02T12:50:17+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3eb24d6f@epflnews.epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3eb24bd7$1@epflnews.epfl.ch
Rodrigo Garc�a wrote:
> But imagine a list of access types, even if some of them have
> the value null, you might want to return that value as well (it is not
> that they are not in the list).
Sorry, this argument is quite stupid from my part... you do not have to
use the "null" keyword then, just return the object. Maybe I will have
to rethink the possibility of using exceptions...
Rodrigo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-02 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01 8:58 `
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-01 9:06 `
2003-05-01 9:58 ` Martin Krischik
2003-05-01 13:00 `
2003-05-02 9:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-05-02 10:43 `
2003-05-02 10:50 ` [this message]
2003-05-01 10:09 `
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 9:52 `
2003-05-02 16:18 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05 8:14 `
2003-05-05 16:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox