Re: Generic formal access types

Well, the workaround has another problem: the compiler cannot check if 
the type I pass in the instantiation is an access type nor if the 
"Null_Value" object is really null... But I suppose that is why we call 
it a "workaround".   ;^)

In the end, I think I will stick to my own workaround, but thanks again 
for your ideas.

Rodrigo

Rodrigo García wrote:
> That seems a nice workaround, although I still have to pass two 
> parameters during instantiation. I will give it a try!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rodrigo
> 
> 
> 
> Chad R. Meiners wrote:
> 
> How about
> 
> generic
>    type Access_Type is private;
>    Null_Value : Access_Type;
> 
> -CRM
>