From: reinert <reinkor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Many overlook the possibility sin(x,360.0) ?
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 23:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-05-01T23:37:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e8fb7a2-e218-4b0e-8a20-174162392093@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516be18c-b83e-457b-8f46-a6d8719e0134@googlegroups.com>
My point is that "x" and "period" has the same dimmension in sin(x,period).
"x" (and "Period") may not represent radians or degree. "x" may represent for example time (seconds) or meters - or lightyears :-) In some way "radians" and "degree" are "dimmensionless" varaiables (do not miss-understand me here).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-01 5:22 Many overlook the possibility sin(x,360.0) ? reinert
2017-05-01 8:50 ` hreba
2017-05-01 17:46 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2017-05-01 20:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-05-01 20:46 ` Shark8
2017-05-02 6:37 ` reinert [this message]
2017-05-02 8:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-05-03 4:12 ` reinert
2017-05-03 7:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-05-08 17:37 ` reinert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox