From: "Frank" <franjoe@frisurf.no>
Subject: Re: new/free of abstract types
Date: 1 Apr 2003 09:30:37 +0100
Date: 2003-04-01T09:30:37+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e894e2b$1@news.wineasy.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1ec946d1.0303310759.5c6babbb@posting.google.com
>
> Let me know if any of this isn't clear. You asked an important
> question, and it touches upon aspects of the language with which many
> programmers aren't familiar.
Hi!
Thank you for help. This is what I "deduced" from Norman Cohens book also
:-)
It is just that it looks as if I want to initialise the new object with the
values from the parameter one.
As you may notice I have the parameter as "out" mode. This prototyping gives
me the impression that someting is sent in to
the subprogram still (tag perhaps?). Is it a problem for me to use only
"out" in this parameter or should I use "in out"?
Frank
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-01 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-31 7:41 new/free of abstract types Frank
2003-03-31 15:59 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-04-01 8:30 ` Frank [this message]
2003-04-01 15:13 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox