Subject: Re: Ada Streams representation - XML
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:45:01 +0100
Date: 2003-03-28T19:45:01+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e849834$1@epflnews.epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E846E58.3080905@psu.edu
Robert Spooner wrote:
> The important thing to remember is that the stream representation (which
> can be whatever you want so long as it can be represented in an array of
> Stream_Element) is associated with the type, not the stream itself.
Yes, we agree, that is one of the limitations I was talking about:
you cannot serialize an object of a specific type using different
representations (i.e. you cannot have two different 'Write procedures
for the same type).
Thank you for your ideas and experiences,
Rodrigo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-28 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-27 16:31 Ada Streams representation
2003-03-27 18:51 ` Robert Spooner
2003-03-28 9:50 ` Ada Streams representation - XML
2003-03-28 15:46 ` Robert Spooner
2003-03-28 18:45 ` [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox