From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:29:16 +0500
Date: 2003-01-22T22:08:34+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2f1662$0$33931$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
In article <wcciswh2kkx.fsf@shell01.theworld.com>,
Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
> porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
>
>> Are you sure, which item of Standard deprecates this?
>
> 13.11.2(16). How could it be otherwise?
I meant the case when two pool variables share the same memory (e.g.
one pool uses other for allocation).
Well, I realize that eliminating this restriction would have bad impact
on memory debuggers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-22 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-22 8:01 Intermixing two storage pools Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 8:42 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 16:52 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-22 20:29 ` Victor Porton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-22 10:35 Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 7:42 Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox