From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:42:05 +0500
Date: 2003-01-22T10:22:51+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2e70fb$0$33928$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
In article <mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>,
"Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
>> I have to user-defined storage pools.
>>
>> Is it OK to allocate ("new") by one of them and deallocate by the other
>> ("Uncheked_Deallocation"), using conversions between access types.
>
> No, as far as I know that's even erroneous. You must deallocated from the same
> pool you allocated it.
Are you sure, which item of Standard deprecates this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-22 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-22 8:01 Intermixing two storage pools Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 8:42 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2003-01-22 16:52 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-22 20:29 ` Victor Porton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-22 10:35 Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 7:42 Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox