From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Problem Eliminating constructors
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:38:13 +0500
Date: 2003-01-21T19:42:13+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2da294$0$33926$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3e274cad$0$33929$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
In article <u8yxe5yv2.fsf@nasa.gov>,
Stephen Leake <Stephen.A.Leake@nasa.gov> writes:
> porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
>
>> It would be nice if Ada0X would allow to make a primitive operation
>> non-virtual.
>>
>> E.g. we can introduce "pragma Freeze(TYPE)".
>
> How is this better than a nested package?
>
> package Foo is
> type Base is tagged private;
>
> package Constructors is
> function New_Base (Params : in ...) return Base;
> end Constructors;
>
> private
> type Base is ...;
>
> end Foo;
Very simple: I more like syntax without this additional package
as it is antinatural.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-21 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 0:19 Problem Eliminating constructors Victor Porton
2003-01-17 15:21 ` John English
2003-01-17 21:10 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-18 15:19 ` Simon Wright
2003-01-20 11:39 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-20 21:07 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-21 9:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-01-21 19:01 ` Martin Krischik
2003-01-21 11:43 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 15:03 ` Stephen Leake
2003-01-21 13:09 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 15:26 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 18:38 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2003-01-23 17:08 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-17 6:54 Grein, Christoph
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox