From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Problem Eliminating constructors
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:09:08 +0500
Date: 2003-01-21T19:28:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e2d9f6e$0$33923$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3e274cad$0$33929$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
In article <3E2D3245.2060903@epfl.ch>,
Rodrigo Garc�a <rodrigo.garcia@epfl.ch> writes:
>>>Victor Porton wrote:
>>>
>> Oh, Rodrigo, I oversimplified the real situation. Initialization with
>> just aggregates is possible only in the example, really I need namely
>> constructor functions.
>
> I see... Have you tried with controlled types?
Do you mean to use type discriminants by Initialize procedure?
I suspect this is a size overhead in current compilers (Gnat 3.14/3.15
for me).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-21 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 0:19 Problem Eliminating constructors Victor Porton
2003-01-17 15:21 ` John English
2003-01-17 21:10 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-18 15:19 ` Simon Wright
2003-01-20 11:39 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-20 21:07 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-21 9:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-01-21 19:01 ` Martin Krischik
2003-01-21 11:43 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 15:03 ` Stephen Leake
2003-01-21 13:09 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2003-01-22 15:26 ` Rodrigo García
2003-01-21 18:38 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-23 17:08 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-17 6:54 Grein, Christoph
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox