From: dontwantspam@abc.com (Jan)
Subject: Re: parameter modes
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 15:10:35 GMT
Date: 2002-12-26T15:10:35+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e0b1758.12154890@news.freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d0adua.hs3.ln@beastie.ix.netcom.com
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:03:56 -0800, Dennis Lee Bieber
<wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>freely used on both sides of an assignment. No specification is made on
>whether IN OUT uses by-reference or value-return (by-copy in each
>direction); it is perfectly valid for an implementation to copy the
>value to a local (stack) location, use that copy internally, and then
>copy the last value back to the original variable on return from the
>procedure.
This is what I wanted to hear, thanks.
Jan
---
eMail: janp9 @ gmx.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-26 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-25 19:18 parameter modes Jan
2002-12-25 20:32 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-12-26 0:03 ` Stapler
2002-12-26 0:09 ` Larry Kilgallen
[not found] ` <d0adua.hs3.ln@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
2002-12-26 15:10 ` Jan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1988-11-15 13:05 Parameter modes Dale Gaumer
1988-11-18 14:06 ` Robert Firth
1988-11-21 23:46 ` Michael Murphy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox