comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Superconducting Ada compilers ?
@ 1994-12-27 14:47 Gregory Aharonian
  1994-12-27 16:01 ` David Weller
  1994-12-28 15:01 ` John Volan
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Aharonian @ 1994-12-27 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)


      Superconducting Ada compilers?  Sounds like a dumb way for the DoD to
invest its money, which fortunately the DoD isn't doing.  But just as dumb is
the following announcement:

	"Superconductor Technologies (Santa Barbara, CA) has been
	granted a $1.9 million contract from the Naval Research
	Laboratory to develop and evaluate cyro-cooled SPARC
	workstations.  Superconductor Technologies will work with
	Sun Microsystems, Ross Technologies and nCHIP to develop
	the workstation".

Can't the DoD find a better way to invest taxpayer's dollars?  The workstation
industry is highly competitive with billions of dollar of private investment
already exploring many ways to improve workstations for both public and
government use.  If this idea (super-cooled workstations) makes any economic
sense, I am sure one or more of the companies (especially some of the Japanese
companies, which have access to government funds for applied cyrogenics) would
do so, and the DoD wouldn't have to waste precious bodily fluids (i.e. money).

Instead, the DoD could take the $1.9 million dollars and have one of their
contractors find out the most important bit of information that affects the
$20 billion DoD software development budget (or they could give me $190,000):

		WHAT PERCENT OF THE DOD IS USING ADA ???????

Fifteen years into Ada, hundreds of millions spent on Ada policy management
and research projects, estimates of over 50% of the DoD not using Ada, and
no one in this country in and out of the military knows this figure.  With
this figure, and the project set up to calculate it, which can be used to
track this figure in each succeeding year with little effort, the DoD would
have a very powerful tool to determine how (in)effective its Ada policies are.
Measuring such fundamental numbers is at the heart of scientific analysis of
the type that Edmonds keeps on talking about.

But noooooooo, the DoD would rather develop a superconducting workstation,
probably with a follow on contract to develop a superconducting Ada compiler*.
Either take the Ada Mandate seriously and manage it properly, or drop it.
But to continue to spend tens of millions of dollars without honestly knowing
the effectiveness of such policies is a violation of the taxpayer's trust.


		WHAT PERCENT OF THE DOD IS USING ADA ???????


Greg Aharonian


* Maybe the DoD will have the Army develop superconducting versions of their
new object oriented languages to be used with the Air Force's non-Ada AI CASE
environments on the Navy's superconducting workstations to take advantage of
all of ARPA's cutting edge non-Ada software technology while DISA figures out
how to keep entrepreneurs out of next year's Ada Summit and keep Ada out of
the SBIRs.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Superconducting Ada compilers ?
  1994-12-27 14:47 Superconducting Ada compilers ? Gregory Aharonian
@ 1994-12-27 16:01 ` David Weller
  1994-12-28 15:01 ` John Volan
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Weller @ 1994-12-27 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)


Just wouldn't feel like Christmas without the traditional "Holiday
Rant."

Thanks, Greg!  I knew we could count on you. :-)

-- 
       Frustrated with C/C++, Pascal, Fortran?  Ada95 _might_ be for you!
	  For all sorts of interesting Ada95 tidbits, run the command:
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)
			   Proud employee of 
Link^H^H^H^Singer-Link^H^H^H^^H^H^HCAE-Link^H^H^H^H^H Hughes Training.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Superconducting Ada compilers ?
  1994-12-27 14:47 Superconducting Ada compilers ? Gregory Aharonian
  1994-12-27 16:01 ` David Weller
@ 1994-12-28 15:01 ` John Volan
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Volan @ 1994-12-28 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)


srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:

[snip]

>	Laboratory to develop and evaluate cyro-cooled SPARC
                                           ^^^^
[snip]

>companies, which have access to government funds for applied cyrogenics) would
                                                              ^^^^^^^^^^

For those of you who might be a bit confused at this point by what
Greg is talking about, let me see if I can clarify it: "Cyrogenics" is
the art of jealously griping about the fabulous successes of Cyrus I
(?-529 B.C.), the ancient king of the Medes and Persians who founded
the Persian Empire.

This is not to be confused with "cryogenics", the science that deals
with the production of very low temperatures and their effects on the
properties of matter.  [Webster's New World Dictionary]

This is also not to be confused with "cyranogenics", the art of
overcoming one's own personal failures (such as losing the woman you
love to a dumber but handsomer man because your large, ugly nose makes
you too self-conscious to show her what a great poet you are; or such
as failing to make big bucks in the 1980's because the market just
wasn't ready for your ideas and was prejudiced against you because it
perceived you as being in a DoD niche) by steadfastly refusing to
whine about your misfortunes, or blame anybody else for them, or put
down everybody else's good fortune; but instead, through perseverence,
getting over previous setbacks and winning out in the end (such as
winning back the woman you love by revealing that it was really you
behind the bushes feeding pretty-boy his lines; or such as winning a
bigger piece of the pie in the 1990's by fighting the "DoD-niche"
propaganda and demonstrating that you really do have a superior
solution just when the market is getting dissatisfied with what's
available and is ripe for something better.)

Just thought I'd lighten things up a little bit in this season of
hope and good will ... :-)

John Volan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Me : Person :=
   (Name => "John G. Volan",  E_Mail_Address => "jgv@swl.msd.ray.com",
    Company => "Raytheon",    Affiliation => "Enthusiastic member of Team-Ada!",
    Favorite_Slogan => "Ada95: The World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL",
    Humorous_Disclaimer =>
      "These opinions are undefined by my employer, so using them would be "  &
      "totally erroneous ... or would that be a bounded error? :-) ");
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1994-12-28 15:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1994-12-27 14:47 Superconducting Ada compilers ? Gregory Aharonian
1994-12-27 16:01 ` David Weller
1994-12-28 15:01 ` John Volan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox