From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Two class-wide operands, but only one controlling
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:27:56 +0500
Date: 2002-11-24T08:29:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3de08dce$0$301$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ddfa8b8$0$304$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
In article <ubs4gvzea.fsf@wanadoo.fr>,
Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
>
>> I want something like a procedure with two class-wide operands,
>> (of two different types) but only one of these controlling.
>>
>> The solution I found is introducing new tagged record
>> types which would refer to these two types and passing both
>> operands as one operand in such the record. Other solutions?
>
> Declare the second one as a class-wide ('Class) parameter.
What?! It is clearly stated that I want _both_ of them
class wide...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-23 16:10 Two class-wide operands, but only one controlling Victor Porton
2002-11-23 19:50 ` Pascal Obry
2002-11-24 8:27 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2002-11-24 8:59 ` Samuel Tardieu
2002-11-24 11:34 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-24 21:56 ` Pascal Obry
2002-11-25 22:17 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-27 17:25 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-25 19:19 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox