From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Style: always declare subrountines?
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 11:39:32 +0500
Date: 2002-11-09T07:58:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3dccc023$0$304$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
How do you consider this:
If one would always declare every subrountine of a package body in the
specification (in the public or in the private part) this excludes the
possibility that one may mistakedly create an internal subrountine with
the same specification as a not yet implemented public procedure and
forget to implement this public procedure and so get wrong program
behavior.
Stylistic checkers for always declaring in package specification?
next reply other threads:[~2002-11-09 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-09 6:39 Victor Porton [this message]
2002-11-09 11:09 ` Style: always declare subrountines? sk
2002-11-09 12:34 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-09 14:34 ` Jim Rogers
2002-11-09 14:53 ` sk
2002-11-09 15:36 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-09 16:16 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-09 16:28 ` chris.danx
2002-11-09 18:36 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-12 17:31 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-18 1:52 ` ;Re: " Richard Riehle
2002-11-28 10:32 ` John English
2002-11-28 12:52 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-12-03 11:15 ` John English
2002-12-03 12:22 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-12-03 13:11 ` John English
2002-12-03 14:31 ` Robert A Duff
2002-12-03 14:41 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-11-28 17:49 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-03 11:09 ` John English
2002-11-28 18:45 ` "private with" proposal Vincent Marciante
2002-11-28 20:12 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-11-29 4:28 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-01 1:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-12-02 18:20 ` Stephen Leake
2002-12-03 5:37 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-03 19:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-12-04 3:52 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox