From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
Subject: Re: Booch: iterator invalidation
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:05:53 +0500
Date: 2002-11-09T03:20:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3dcc7efc$0$305$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
In article <iYOy9.16284$Dc4.56479@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>,
"Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> writes:
> "Victor Porton" <porton@ex-code.com> wrote in message
> news:3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net...
>> What are conditions when Booch iterators are invalidated?
>> It is missing in the documentation.
>>
> Usually no need to resort to #ifdef preprocessor stuff.. Just make a generic
> formal
> that says error checking enabled. Generic actual parameter is a
> constant/static then any decent compiler will optimize out any of the actual
> checks in the object code and you get the same effect as the #ifdefs without
> the lack of portability.
I suggested #ifdef because as I remeber I've readied somewhere that
modern Ada compilers use code sharing for generics, not repeated
compilation like C++.
What about GNAT in particular?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-08 12:51 Booch: iterator invalidation Victor Porton
2002-11-08 13:26 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-11-08 21:00 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-11-08 18:05 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2002-11-09 14:20 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-12 16:50 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-12 18:28 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-12 20:09 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-13 14:49 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-12 17:42 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-12 20:11 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-13 2:43 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-13 14:56 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-13 15:40 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox