Re: Compiler error: 'Expect procedure name in procedure call'

[Vinzent Hoefler <JeLlyFish.software@gmx.net>]

j_del_strother@hotmail.com (Jon) wrote:

>Which leads on to my next question...
>Can you call a function & ignore its return value?  I'm using a lot of
>Win32 calls, all of which are written as functions rather than
>procedures, and I'm getting a huge mess of useless temporary variables
>just to allow me to call the functions.

Are you *sure*, you won't have to check the function result?

Perhaps you could use a declare block around the "function" call with
a local variable to store the result. The optimizer should be easily
able to remove this reference.


Vinzent.