Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT GPL 2009?

[Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>]

On Apr 27, 9:36 am, Samuel Tardieu <s...@rfc1149.net> wrote:
> Also note that the your example compiles fine using either GCC 4.3.3 or
> later using
>
>   with package S is new Signature (<>);

It also compiles fine with GNU GPL 2008 and is beside the point. The
original example was cut down from existing code to a minimal example.
In the original, there were other named parameters along with
"( others => <> )", and so eliding the "other =>" part of the syntax
is not an option.