From: nickroberts@blueyonder.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Subject: Re: Alternatives to ailing Ada.
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:04:32 GMT
Date: 2002-09-03T00:04:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d73fb51.158200195@news.cis.dfn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: n325nu425f3sfcn61f5429rrh0seffeqln@4ax.com
On Mon, 02 Sep 2002 07:37:18 +1000, henderson was no auteur
<morbid_dreams@cia.gov> strongly typed:
>Now there is Visual Studio.NET.
>C# totally blows Ada away.
Does it really? This is surely a very important question.
C# may have lots of fancy features that Ada 95 doesn't, but I suspect it
may well have some weaknesses compared to Ada 95. Nevertheless, where there
is a choice, should the discerning software engineer now choose Ada or C#?
This thread IS NOT to become a language warzone. Keep it factual,
objective, polite, and concise.
--
Nick Roberts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-03 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-01 21:37 Alternatives to ailing Ada henderson was no auteur
2002-09-03 0:04 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2002-09-03 12:46 ` chris.danx
2002-09-03 0:33 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-09-03 2:25 ` Nick Roberts
2002-09-03 3:31 ` Jim Rogers
2002-09-03 3:37 ` Joe Vlietstra
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox