From: Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Primitive subprogram for a subtype?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 05:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-08-21T05:42:22-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d3829f7-b256-4002-8a28-a9a0c9fe40d4@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <onejsp$1i5j$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On Monday, August 21, 2017 at 2:32:29 PM UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote:
>
> How is it related to having the same tag?
It's not. Types can have primitive subprograms without being tagged.
--
~egilhh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-20 22:45 Primitive subprogram for a subtype? Victor Porton
2017-08-21 7:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-21 12:32 ` Victor Porton
2017-08-21 12:42 ` Egil H H [this message]
2017-08-21 12:50 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-08-21 14:00 ` J-P. Rosen
2017-08-21 7:36 ` mockturtle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox