From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Subject: +Re: Can any body clarify me !!
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:37:29 +0100
Date: 2002-06-05T15:37:29+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cfe2133$1@pull.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnafs562.aa1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnafs562.aa1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:17:47 +0100, Martin Dowie wrote:
> > "Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
> > news:slrnafs1g8.aa1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> > [snip]
> >> Why would you want to do that? It sounds to me that you will only have
> >> more problems editing your files this way.
> >
> > One 'real' target version, one 'fake' host version, test stub versions
etc.
>
> Then I would recommend using CVS
Well, you could but I usually like having all version hanging around
in a:
<project root>
+ <csci1 name>
| + <csc1 name>
| | + spec
| | + host
| | | + build
| | | + test
| | + target1
| | | + build
| | | + test
| | + target2
| | + build
| | + test
| + <csc2 name>
+ <csci2 name>
etc
still directory structure with the same structure within the
config system. If target1 and target2 share a body I can always
'link' them together with the config tool (never found a config
tool that didn't have this, yet...)
Each to there own...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-05 11:40 Can any body clarify me !! anil kumar hosamani
2002-06-05 12:37 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-05 12:47 ` chris.danx
2002-06-05 13:17 ` Martin Dowie
2002-06-05 13:40 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-05 14:37 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2002-06-06 12:25 ` +Re: " Robert Dewar
2002-06-06 1:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-06 1:51 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-05 18:03 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox