From: rentmei@asterix.uni-muenster.de (Jahn Rentmeister)
Subject: Re: GNAT-Problem '+'-operator with Count
Date: 8 Dec 1994 19:45:14 GMT
Date: 1994-12-08T19:45:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c7noa$4d2m@obelix.uni-muenster.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: D0GqBM.IzH@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Bob Duff (bobduff@dsd.camb.inmet.com) wrote:
: >Andreas Krohn <ak@informatik.tu-cottbus.de> wrote:
: >> 148. procedure solve_matrix(source: in matrix;target: in out matrix) is
: >> 149. x,y,i,j:Count; --akt. Pos. in Matrix
: >> 157. for x in 1..3 loop --nachbarn ermitteln
: >> 158. for y in 1..3 loop
: Hard to say. My answer's a guess, too. Anyway, in an extremely polite
: forum such as this, who would ever accuse anyone of "spouting BS"?
: Instead, I respectfully submit that my guess is more likely correct than
: yours. ;-)
Given that x and y are declared twice (once in the declarative part as Count
and once implicitly in the loop as integer) you might actually be right -
but who can be sure?
-Jahn
--
Those who can, do. Those who can't, try.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-12-08 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-12-02 13:23 GNAT-Problem '+'-operator with Count Andreas Krohn
1994-12-03 12:24 ` Jim Marks
1994-12-05 12:46 ` Joseph Skinner
1994-12-07 22:54 ` Bob Duff
1994-12-08 19:45 ` Jahn Rentmeister [this message]
1994-12-09 15:33 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox