Re: Next public release of GNAT(?)

[Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org>]

Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:

> Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> writes:
> 
> > Gerhard H�ring <gerhard@bigfoot.de> writes:
> > 
> > > Frank wrote in <ILS_7.24134$KQ3.444593@news1.oke.nextra.no>:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >  
> > > > Is there any forecast on when(if?) the public/free GNAT 3-14 for Linux
> > > > becomes available?
> > > 
> > > Yes, it will be the day after I managed to build GNAT from the gcc
> > > source tree.
> > 
> > AFAIK, what is present in the CVS tree is an evolution of GNAT 3.14
> > (which is still based on gcc 2.8).
> 
> No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc 3.0, and the
> Ada code builds on that. This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15
> release. 

There is a misunderstanding, my comment applied to GNAT 3.14, not to
what is in the CVS tree.

> > BTW, personnally, I'd not make public an executable I manage to
> > build from non released sources.
> 
> Hmm. What do you mean by "released"? By ACT, or by the gcc team? If
> the latter, I'd agree.

The gcc team obviously (but I don't think that gcc team will release
the ada part without an agrement of Robert Dewar and from what I get
the status about ada in 3.1 is "will be present if it is in a
aceptable state")

-- 
Jean-Marc