From: "Thierry BERNIER" <tajz@free.fr>
Subject: Re: Constant elaboration order
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:16:32 +0100
Date: 2001-12-06T23:15:23+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c0fedf4$0$203$626a54ce@news.free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0112010843.6ad01bc3@posting.google.com
Bonjour,
Thanks to Ted and Robert, I just read the indicated chapter nn GNAT user's
guide. Interesting and I will read it again with less noise around. May be I
will try to move some elaboration code to public packages's sub-program and
call them explicitely in the main program (as it is proposed in the GNAT
UG).
BUT,
my question was about a given executable. When the compiler, binder and
linker have processed source files. My executable is here and I would like
to assert that from one run to another of this executable; elaboration code
chunks are executed in the same order (the one statically choosen by the
binder).
I understand this is true for GNAT, but found no rule in the RM (we can
forget annex E here).
Thierry Bernier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-30 21:59 Constant elaboration order Thierry BERNIER
2001-12-01 1:25 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-01 16:43 ` Robert Dewar
2001-12-06 22:16 ` Thierry BERNIER [this message]
2001-12-06 22:33 ` Matthew Heaney
2001-12-07 14:34 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox